dualathlonserver.com

Home > Snmp Error > Snmp Error No Such Instance

Snmp Error No Such Instance

Contents

SNMP works properly on about 150 switchports, but around 20 ports cant be monitored since the 29th of march. Refine your search. Whether that is standards conformant or not, Zabbix should be able to monitor such agents and it seems to be as simple as removing the check for SNMPv1 above. Please use the SNMP Tester, what results do you get? http://dualathlonserver.com/snmp-error/snmp-error-223-no-such-instance.php

Show Aleksandrs Saveljevs added a comment - 2014 May 07 16:07 Ray, it seems that you have reported your problem separately in ZBX-8185 . I have tried using auto discovery and manually adding the OIDs 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8 and none of them work. The snmpd.conf on my Linux server is configured and if i use zabbix it can view the disk usage but zabbix no! For instance, see the first packet where the device returns "noSuchName" error for Patton: It says that OID .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.5.2 (which corresponds to item "patton2291.apra.it:IF-MIB-ifSpeed.[2]") is not to be found. check over here

Nosuchinstance Snmp

Its just annoying in the error overview to have all these ports (also on some other switches) shown up. Thanks again for the quick support and pointing me to the right direction! Reload Audio Image Help How to Buy Join DevCentral Ask a Question Email Preferences Contact F5 Careers Events Policies Trademarks © 2015 F5 Networks, Inc.

  • Thanks, Jaap *) Both Debian squeeze and wheezy use snmpd (net-snmp) 5.4.3.
  • I don't think, that this is not a bug in zabbix - everything was fine many months.
  • However, the behavior of Lotus described by Tobias is unexpected, where SNMPv2 agent behaves like SNMPv1.
  • Login New Question Overview Unanswered Tags Users & Badges Back to www.paessler.com Intuitive to Use.Easy to manage. 150.000 administrators have chosen PRTG to monitor their network.

Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0: value=Raven XE EV-DO # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0: value=130388 # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.4.0: value= # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.5.0: value= # Test 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.6.0: value=No response (check: firewalls, routing, snmp settings of device, IPs, SNMP Add comment Created on Apr 25, 2016 8:03:30 AM by Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support] Permalink 6 Replies Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Hello, Thank you very much for your KB-Post. Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. Snmp Error Codes Hide Permalink Strategist added a comment - 2015 Oct 21 13:21 - edited I have this problem now on zabbix 2.2.10, before upgrade from 2.0.14 to 2.2.10 all worked fine Show

What results does that yield? Prtg Snmp Error # -2003 then I modified my MIB as below(deleted the leaf memeryUsage ): TEST-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS netSnmpExamples FROM NET-SNMP-EXAMPLES-MIB ifIndex FROM RFC1213-MIB OBJECT-TYPE, Integer32, IpAddress,Counter64,enterprises, MODULE-IDENTITY FROM SNMPv2-SMI DisplayString, MacAddress, TruthValue All rights reserved. https://kb.paessler.com/en/topic/69283-no-such-instance-snmp-error-223 The oid is for a cisco voice gateway to monitor active calls.

Free PRTG Download >> What is this? Snmp No Such Object Can you please re-add the sensors for a test? else if (STAT_SUCCESS == status && SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME == response->errstat && 0 != response->errindex && ITEM_TYPE_SNMPv1 == items[0].type) { /* If a request PDU contains a bad variable, the specified behavior is Setting the security on the attachment to "Restricted to Users" is enough to block public download of the attachment?

Prtg Snmp Error # -2003

Add comment Created on Oct 26, 2010 2:42:17 PM by Getronics Belgium (50) ●1 ●1 Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down I also have this issue. http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/9000/900/sol9937 However, squeeze has lm-sensors 3.1.2 and wheezy has 3.3.2. Nosuchinstance Snmp Please try again: Please enter the words to the right: Please enter the numbers you hear: Additional Comments (optional) Type your comment here (1000 character limit)... Snmpget No Such Instance Currently Exists At This Oid Free PRTG Download >> What is this?

Tested it so far with one sensor and it seems to work fine. get redirected here The affected devices seem to be only: Patton Smartnode gateways: http://www.patton.com/smartnode/ Cisco SMB Switches: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/switches/small-business-300-series-managed-switches/index.html The items keep going not supported and back. Use at your own risk. That was wrong I guess. Prtg Snmperr_no_vars

Find out how you can reduce cost, increase QoS and ease planning, as well. Show Aleksandrs Saveljevs added a comment - 2016 May 31 10:15 Fixed in pre-2.2.14rc1 r60421, pre-3.0.4rc1 r60422, pre-3.1.0 (trunk) r60423. So I think we might need a per host switch that allows us to disable bulk requests for that device, because in my case Windows refuses to give any data at navigate to this website No, thanks

Show Cristian Mammoli added a comment - 2014 Apr 16 16:17 So probably the snmp implementations on this devices are to blame. "snmp Error # -2003" Box 382 Davis CA 95617 email: [email protected] " DESCRIPTION "A simple mib for demonstration purposes. " ::= { netSnmpExamples 4 } aTestSetting OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { testMIB 1 } --******************************************************************************************* tSetting Are you polling from the same IP / management range ?

Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping.

Answer by Damien Dallimore [Splunk] Jul 08, 2013 at 08:01 AM Comment 10 |10000 characters needed characters left 0 Hi, my local [email protected]_ta: [snmp://fortigate_A_FORTINET-CORE-MIB_query] communitystring = forti destination = x.x.x.x do_bulk_get This could have been caused by a device reboot or configuration change on the device. first supported, others - no, later - second supported, others - not, etc., approximately every 5 minutes. Snmpd.conf Example Similarly, see the following packet for Cisco: It says, for instance, that OIDs .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.14.54 and .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.14.55 (items "sg300-1.apra.it:IF-MIB-ifInErrors. [54] " and "sg300-1.apra.it:IF-MIB-ifInErrors. [54] ") are not to be found.

Thank you for your help, this seems to work fine :) Add comment Created on Apr 25, 2016 9:01:05 AM by Fraggles (0) ●1 Permalink Please log in or register to People Assignee: Unassigned Reporter: Cristian Mammoli Votes: 0 Vote for this issue Watchers: 5 Start watching this issue Dates Created: 2014 Apr 16 10:27 Updated: 2016 Jun 06 11:45 Resolved: 2016 Right. my review here You are invited to get involved by asking and answering questions!

Skip to ContentSkip to FooterSolutions Transform to a Hybrid Infrastructure Protect Your Digital Enterprise Empower the Data-Driven Organization Enable Workplace Productivity Cloud Security Big Data Mobility Infrastructure Internet of Things Small Show Aleksandrs Saveljevs added a comment - 2014 Apr 17 09:46 It seems that there is nothing to fix on Zabbix side. Add comment Created on Apr 25, 2016 8:03:30 AM by Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support] Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Perfect! Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind.

Works fine. Get Started Skip Tutorial Splunk.com Documentation Splunkbase Answers Wiki Blogs Developers Sign Up Sign in FAQ Refine your search: Questions Apps Users Tags Search Home Answers ask a question Badges Tags Please give me some time to check it. So I just went ahead and converted the Lotus template to use the SNMPv1 agent.

For the current already "broken" sensors, you can manually edit the interface number field (just use the new sensors and copy it from them), to get them working again. Add comment Created on Dec 23, 2013 9:26:10 AM by Patrick Hutter [Paessler Support] (7,144) ●3 ●3 Permalink Please log in or register to enter your reply. Add comment Created on Apr 22, 2016 10:05:13 AM by Torsten Lindner [Paessler Support] Permalink Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Hey, thx for replying!

>